 |
Pythagoras'
Mystery Tablet
Posted June 4,
2001 as a Math Forum EPoW
|
Introduction: In this problem,
students used an applet to compute
the area of a square based on its
side length. They then used this
information to determine whether
it was possible to get exact side
lengths for certain areas.
|
|
Wheres the Math: The goal
of this problem was to get students
to investigate the concept of irrational
numbers through a familiar concept
like area. Students realized that
certain areas, like 4, had an exact
side length, while others, like
2, did not. This led to questions
about the categorization of such
numbers, based on how "easy"
it was to get an exact area. Without
actually introducing the mathematical
nomenclature, students discovered
the existence of certain irrational
numbers.
Standards: Number
& operations
Role of Components: Standard
Java text field components
display
both the fractional and decimal
representation of the side length.
The
growable area box is just a Java
text area component
with a
fancy border. The area display at
the bottom uses more text field
components, but with editing disallowed.
Finally, the Tablet display on the
side is just a ".gif" image on the applet's
HTML page. An invisible "model"
component handles the arbitrary
precision arithmetic.
|
|
|

Try the applet!
top
Sample submitted solutions:
From: Sharon, age 13
School: Issaquah Middle School, Issaquah,
Washington
1. Use the applet to answer these questions:
a. If side length = 4, area = 16
b. If side length = 3/4, area = 9/16
c. If side length = 2.5, area = 6.25
d. What is the relationship between the
side length and area of a square?
The square of the side length equals the
area of the square
2. Use the applet to find the corresponding
side lengths for each area on the mysterious
tablet. Describe your strategy for finding
each side length (or explain why you werent
able to find one).
a. If area = 9, side length = 3 The
square route of 9 is 3.
b. If area = 3, side length = Could
not find one because the side length was
not rational. A approximate answer would
be 1.73. Since 1^2 is 1 and 2^2 is 4, The
square route of 3 is between 1 and 2. It
would be closer to 2 because 3 is closer
to 4, so I plugged in the number 1.7. Then
seeing that the square of 1.7 was close
to three I added another digit to the right
until the square of that number was pretty
close to 3 but not over.
c. If area = 1/9 (0.111111...), side
length = 1/3 since the square
route of 9 is three, the square route of
1/9 is 1/3
d. If area = 5/36 (0.138888...), side
length = Couldn't find one because the
side length was not rational. Though 36's
square route is 6, 5's square route does
not repeat and cannot be converted to fraction
form. An approximate answer would be 1/3,
since 36's square route is 6 and 5's square
route is around 2.
3. Think about the difficulty of computing
some of the side lengths versus others.
Explain what Pythagoras was doing in the
third column when he put the side lengths
into two categories of numbers.
At that time he maybe just thought of which
solutions on the tablet he could solve and
which he could not solve and then wrote
down symbols representing that category
of numbers. These categories would also
be numbers that terminated or can be displayed
by fractions and which numbers did not terminate
or cannot displayed by fractions.
Bonus Question: How would you translate
the two category symbols (~ and *) in the
third column into English?
~ means numbers that have rational square
routes (areas that have rational side lengths)-numbers
that terminate or repeat. * means numbers
that have irrational square routes (areas
that have irrational side lengths)-numbers
that do not terminate or repeat. Perhaps
~ also meant that the solutions were easy
to solve (or solvable) and * meant that
the solutions were very difficult to solve
(or not being able to solve at all)
From: Jacob, age 15
School: Pembroke Hill School, Kansas
City, Missouri
1. Use the applet to answer these questions:
a. If side length = 4, area = 16
b. If side length = 3/4, area = 9/16
c. If side length = 2.5, area = 6.25
d. What is the relationship between the
side length and area of a square?
The area of a square is equal to the side
length squared. A=x^2
2. Use the applet to find the corresponding
side lengths for each area on the mysterious
tablet. Describe your strategy for
finding each side length (or explain why
you werent able to find one).
a. If area = 9, side length = 3
b. If area = 3, side length = 1.732...
(square root of 3)
c. If area = 1/9 (0.111111...), side
length = 1/3
d. If area = 5/36 (0.138888...), side
length = .372... (square root
of 5, divided by 6)
To find the side lengths, I found the square
roots of the areas. When I calculated this,
I used neither the applet or a calculator,
using instead previously memorized values
of sqrt(3) and sqrt(5). Another method of
finding the value of x, using the applet,
would be to enter more and more accurate
values for the side length and recording
the area for each side length, and to continue
as long as one wishes.
3. Think about the difficulty of computing
some of the side lengths versus others.
Explain what Pythagoras was doing in the
third column when he put the side lengths
into two categories of numbers.
It is easier to obtain a value for side
lengths when working with rational numbers.
Pythagoras was grouping numbers into rational>
numbers, which can be expressed as a/b,
with a and b as integers and with b not
equal to 0, and irrational numbers, which
cannot be expressed in that way. It is far
more difficult to calculate irrational numbers
without a calculator.
Bonus Question: How would you translate
the two category symbols (~ and *) in the
third column into English?
I would translate ~ as rational, and * as
irrational. These symbols refer to the side
lengths. sqrt(3) is an irrational number,
while the lengths 2 and 3/2 are rational.
top
|
|
Reflections:
Most students had no trouble with questions
1 and 2, although I have a feeling that
many simply used a calculator and did not
attempt to use the applet. We wanted students
to play with the applet so they could see
what was necessary to compute a square root
without the use of a calculator.
The theme of rational and irrational numbers
existed throughout the answers for both
questions 1 and 2, but the terms were often
used incorrectly. This, combined with not
using the applet, made question 3 and the
bonus difficult for students to solve correctly.
The applet should have shown how difficult
it was to find some square roots, but the
use of a calculator allowed some kids to
never try and to simply write, "no
square root, it is irrational."
For problem 3 and the bonus, almost all
of the students who submitted solutions
wrote that Pythagoras divided the numbers
using rationality. This appeared correct
for most of the solutions, but not all.
I think most thought that irrational numbers
included repeating decimals, and thus some
fractions. It was difficult to get the kids
to see the problem from an angle that didn't
include irrational numbers without explicitly
telling them what to focus on or that any
number that can be written as a fraction
must be rational. The idea of an irrational
number was a huge problem for a lot of people.
It's not clear that the applet helped much
for those who didn't already understand
the concept. For example, I found that some
kids stopped searching for the square root
after one decimal place -- e.g., 1.4 was
close enough for an area of 2.
top
|
|
|