authoring teams

component tools

math standards

escot overviewresearchabout ussitemap
interactive problems Snapshot  |  Submissions  |  Reflections  

2000-2001 EPoWs
Fish Farm I
Fish Farm II
Fractris
Galactic Exchange
Graph Zooming
Hispaniola...
In the Dark...
Marabyn
Marathon Graphing
Mosaic
Polyrhythms
Pythagoras' Mystery...
Rumors
Scale 'n' Pop
Search and Rescue Paths
Search and Rescue II

1999-2000 EPoWs
Earthquake: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Llama: 1 | 2 | 3
Pi Machine: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Pirates...: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Rock, ...: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Scale...: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Search and Rescue
Shoelaces: 1 | 2 | 3

Customizable EPoWs
Graph Zooming

Scale 'n' Bowl 3
posted November 15, 1999
as a Math Forum EPoW

Introduction: In the Scale 'n' Bowl puzzle series, students were given instructions to find a scaling ratio that will enlarge or reduce the blue ball to fit through the green bowling alley and move the two red pins. For each of the alleys, they were asked to explain the scaling ratios tried, why they tried them, and which one worked. After bowling all alleys, students put the scaling ratios which worked in order from smallest to largest, describing how they chose this order.

In this part of the series, students used fractions as scaling ratios.


Where's the Math: The four-part problem maintains the same graphical representation in each section, but requires the use of first decimal, then percentage and fractional notation to manipulate the size of the bowling ball. Students may start with trial and error guessing, but soon discover strategies to narrow the input values to get the necessary ratio. Discovering strategies for finding "in between" ratios scaffolds students to tackle the more complex notation of fractions in this part of the problem series, when they are challenged to explore the relationship between the numerator and the denominator.

Each of the problems in the series requires that students place the ratios in ascending order, encouraging them to revisit their problem-solving strategy and solidify their developing understanding of numerical representations of the concept of scale.

Standards: Number & operations, measurement, geometry

Role of Components: The Scale 'n' Bowl problem series uses Geometer's Sketchpad to animate scaling and bowling actions based on values inputted into number entry fields (labeled with ESCOT labels) and triggered by a button panel. Instructions are displayed via the HTML viewer, and solutions are entered in a text entry box. Users reset the alley with an Action menu. Javascript handles communication among components.

(The applet for this problem is currently unavailable)

top

Sample submitted solution:

1. For each of the 5 alleys, please explain the scaling ratios you tried, why you tried them, and which one worked.
Alley#1: On our first bowl we thought that if we scaled the ball to 2/3 of it's original size it would go through the green tube and hit the balls, we were right.
Alley#2: In our attempts, we scaled the ball in many different sizes. They included: 1/2, 3/4,2/5, 3/5, and 2/6. Finally, we tried 3/7 and this was the correct answer!!!!
Alley#3: We scaled the ball to many different sizes. And through a lucky guess I found that the fraction was 8/15.
Alley #4: We tried several different scaling ratios. Some were 4/3, 5/3, 5/4, 7/4 and finally 6/4 (3/2), which was correct. We tried improper fractions because we observed that the ball had to be bigger than its original size!!!
Alley#5: The ball needed to be enlarged so again I tried 6/4 as our fraction. This was barely to small so I made the fraction 7/4 and this was correct!!!!!

2. After you have bowled all 5 alleys, put the scaling ratios that worked in order from smallest to largest, and tell us how you chose this order.
The scaling ratios from smallest to largest are 1/3, 3/7, 8/15, 2/3, 3/2, and 7/4. We put them in this order by visualizing and knowing how big each one would be in our head.

top

Reflections: This was the most difficult part of the Scale 'n' Bowl puzzle series for students. Many of them were not able to finish the problem, and therefore did not submit a solution. By this time, students had gotten used to the simulation and question, so most of the difficulty lie in trying to manipulate fractions to make appropriate scaling ratios. Through classroom observation, it was noted that students who were successful at finding the correct fraction developed interesting strategies. One common strategy was to incrementally increase/decrease the denominator, and then move on to the numerator. This worked very well. Students used this spontaneously, and it seemed to improve their understanding of fractions. However, students had to make lots of guesses to try to figure out the correct solution, and therefore did not write most of their thinking down. Those who did write their solutions tended to have very long answers. Students also had a great deal of trouble trying to put the fractions in order. This counters the proposition above that students developed a sense of fractional number lines. However, we did see a few students apply the strategy above to answer this question.

top

Home  |  Overview  |  Research  |  About Us  |  Sitemap
Interactive Problems  |  Authoring Teams  |  Component Tools  |  Math Standards
S.R.I. International
  National Science Foundation Grant REC-9804930 copyright © 2001 SRI International