authoring teams

component tools

math standards

escot overviewresearchabout ussitemap
interactive problems Snapshot  |  Submissions  |  Reflections  

2000-2001 EPoWs
Fish Farm I
Fish Farm II
Fractris
Galactic Exchange
Graph Zooming
Hispaniola...
In the Dark...
Marabyn
Marathon Graphing
Mosaic
Polyrhythms
Pythagoras' Mystery...
Rumors
Scale 'n' Pop
Search and Rescue Paths
Search and Rescue II

1999-2000 EPoWs
Earthquake: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Llama: 1 | 2 | 3
Pi Machine: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Pirates...: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Rock, ...: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Scale...: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Search and Rescue
Shoelaces: 1 | 2 | 3

Customizable EPoWs
Graph Zooming

Scale 'n' Bowl 1
Posted November 1, 1999 as a Math Forum EPoW

Introduction: In the Scale 'n' Bowl puzzle series, students were given instructions to find a scaling ratio that will enlarge or reduce the blue ball to fit through the green bowling alley and move the two red pins. For each of the alleys, they were asked to explain the scaling ratios tried, why they tried them, and which one worked. After bowling all alleys, students put the scaling ratios which worked in order from smallest to largest, describing how they chose this order.

In this part of the series, students used decimals as scaling ratios.


Where's the Math: The four-part problem maintains the same graphical representation in each section, but requires the use of first decimal, then percentage and fractional notation to manipulate the size of the bowling ball. Students may start with trial and error guessing, but soon discover strategies to narrow the input values to get the necessary ratio.

Each of the problems in the series requires that students place the ratios in ascending order, encouraging them to revisit their problem-solving strategy and solidify their developing understanding of numerical representations of the concept of scale.

Standards: Number & operations, measurement, geometry

Role of Components: The Scale 'n' Bowl problem series uses Geometer's Sketchpad to animate scaling and bowling actions based on values inputted into number entry fields (labeled with ESCOT labels) and triggered by a button panel. Instructions are displayed via the HTML viewer, and solutions are entered in a text entry box. Users reset the alley with an Action menu. Javascript handles communication among components.

(The applet for this problem is currently unavailable)

top

 

Sample submitted solution:

From: Georgia, age 13
Gregory, age 13
School: School of the Arts, San Francisco, California

1. For each of the 5 alleys, please explain the scaling ratios you tried, why you tried them, and which one worked.
Alley One: We did twenty times two and we got forty. When the ball went through the alley, it knocked the pins. Our previous guess was twenty times three and it was too big, so we reduced it.
Alley Two: We did twenty times three because in our previous game we had guessed three and it was about the size of this problem to hit the balls.
Alley three: We did twenty times 1.45 and got a ball radius of 29 which hit the pins. We stated with 1.5 and it was too big, we got smaller and smaller until the ball was right.
Alley four: We got twenty times .8 and the ball radius was 16 which hit the balls. We started with .68 and got bigger until we got the right radius.
Alley five: We got twenty times .35 with the ball radius of 7. We started with .32 and got bigger.

2. After you have bowled all 5 alleys, put the scaling ratios that worked in order from smallest to largest, and tell us how you chose this order.
Our smallest answer was .35 then .8 then 1.45 then 2 then 3. Because as we look at the ball size it gets smaller with the smaller numbers and bigger with the bigger numbers.

top

Reflections: This puzzle explored the concept of scaling ratios in decimal form. The students were fairly successful in generating successful answers to the puzzle. The first part of the puzzle consisted of several bowling alleys which students had to scale a bowling ball to fit through. Students were asked to keep track of their guesses and explain why they made them. Although some students were able to do this, many simply made guesses until they arrived at the solution, and then tried to remember which guesses they had made afterwards. This defeated the purpose of the puzzle, which was to get students to make their guess and check strategy explicit. Others, however, did note their guesses as they went along, and wrote in why they had made these guesses. In the second part of the puzzle, students were asked to put the decimal scaling ratios they found in order. Students had more difficulty with this task. In terms of making changes to this puzzle, it would be beneficial for student guesses to be automatically generated and noted in their solution box so that they could look back and see their thinking. It's very tedious for them to write each answer as they go along.

top

Home  |  Overview  |  Research  |  About Us  |  Sitemap
Interactive Problems  |  Authoring Teams  |  Component Tools  |  Math Standards
S.R.I. International
  National Science Foundation Grant REC-9804930 copyright © 2001 SRI International